Hi Dyd,
For footprint, read size. Dave's trying to work out how small you can
make a viable Linux system. Incidentally we have delivered x86 systems
for the last year that can boot and run RT applications from a floppy
sized image in less than 8 Megs of RAM. I think this could be reduced
further (with effort).
Regards, Stuart
dyd wrote:
>
> Hi, all
>
> My native language is not English, so I don't know the exact mean of footprint.
> Anybody can help mean, thx a lot.
>
> Dyd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Chase [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 10:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [rtl] RTLinux footprint
>
> << File: londoc.vcf >> I am trying to determine whether some flavor of RT Linux is
>suitable for
> my application. Target is based on the AMD Elan chip (x86 system), <1mB
> pgm memory and flash storage (<4MB). Will use PPP to support online
> target management via SNMP (MIB-based) or WWW (Server based). RT
> performance is not a serious issue. What is a reasonable embedded
> footprint for embedded Linux, supporting simple flash file system,
> protocol stack, and WWW server/SNMP Agent?
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/
