On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:26:36AM +0100, Bart Thissen wrote:
> Does any body has experience with the low latency kernel patch and
> RTL together? I did try this combination once, and found serious
> problems under heavy load, maybe related to bad memory.
Excuse me for asking, but *why* would you want to do this? If you
have RTLinux you get hard real-time guarantees, which can be used in the same
way low latency can. As I remember, the low latency patch just sprinkled
schedule() randomly on the kernel source like magic faery dust. Shouldn't
make a damn bit of difference to RTLinux, since it preempts the regular
Linux kernel anytime it wants. Don't know if there are any adverse effects
the other way around, since I haven't tried this, since I don't see the point.
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/