On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 07:43:37AM +0100, Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If I recall correctly, you were telling me that these tests of yours > > detected something that the tests we've had forever did not test. Now > > you say they do the same thing. I'm lost. > > You know the difference between "implication" and "equivalence"? You see > the extraordinary latencies due to buslocks with the latency tool, but to > be sure that it's not due to some strange software interaction there is > the buslock tool. You just get some more information. If you are happy > with the latency tool, fine.
I'm curious about these "software interactions". There should be none. Can you tell me more? > > Robert > -- > +--------------------------------------------------------+ > | Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de | > | Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | > | Braunschweiger Str. 79, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany | > | Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 | Fax: +49-5121-28619-4 | > +--------------------------------------------------------+ > > > -- [rtl] --- > To unsubscribe: > echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR > echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > For more information on Real-Time Linux see: > http://www.rtlinux.org/ -- --------------------------------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company. www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/
