On Sun, 2002-03-31 at 06:41, Michael Barabanov wrote: > Erwin Rol ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Sat, 2002-03-30 at 20:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > The 2.4 kernel is still shaky. Our commercial version went to > > > 2.4 _way_ too early and with a huge effort we have stable 2.4.16 > > > in the Pro tree. For the GPL tree, we have continued to hope > > > that 2.4 would stabilize and continued to post contributed patches > > > until that time. > > > > Wouldn't a patch to the kernel always be under the GPL license ? So > > where can ppl download the stable 2.4.16 kernel patch, or is the patch > > under a "kind of but not really GPL license" ? > > I suggest you re-read the GPL. >
Oh due to circumstances and my work on some "other" projects i have read it more than is good for me. So since ppl that have those GPL sources (bought or not) are free to redistribute it, i would ask ppl that have them to just post them here, that way ppl that can't spend that much money also will have a stable kernel patch. - Erwin > Michael. > > -- [rtl] --- > To unsubscribe: > echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR > echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > For more information on Real-Time Linux see: > http://www.rtlinux.org/ >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
