On 2013-06-16 20:13, Manuel Huber wrote: > Hi! > > Sorry for the delay, I tried to build a patch for RTAI as well... I have > written a > request to the RTAI Mailing List... > > I'll wait for the RTAI guys to answer the request, and then send the > patch to the Xenomai > mailing list (or is it sufficient to just send you a short mail?). I > believe it's important > that both projects use RTDM the same.
Sure, but - just like for the kernel patches - development takes place in Xenomai. RTAI usually picks up once upstream has merged it. So push you Xenomai patch first. > > I think I will rebase the actual modification in RTnet (timestamping) > once again to > match the style of previous changes in RTnet. Is it a problem that I > first add a new > source file (commit 1) and then recreate autotools configuration and change > GNUmakefile.am in a second commit (commit 2)? Commit 1 will not build... No, this is how I merge stuff as well. Autotools diffs get too huge and make patch review too hard. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ RTnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-developers
