Vit,

Thanks for heads-up, I moved rubygem-boxgrinder* packages upstream to RSpec2. 
Next releases will include the change.

--Marek

On 2011-07-13, at 08:53, Vít Ondruch wrote:

> Hi guys,
> 
> Since February, there are available RSpec 2.x in Fedora repositories. 
> However, as of now, the main package rubygem-rspec was not migrated to RSpec 
> 2.x and still provides RSpec 1.3 functionality. It would be nice, if we could 
> finish the migration to RSpec 2.x lets say in F17 time frame. What are your 
> opinions? The list of packages which depends on RSpec 1.3 is attached bellow.
> 
> If you wonder how to use RSpec 2.x for your package, it is usually quite 
> easy. In you spec just replace
> 
> BuildRequires: rubygem(rspec)
> 
> with
> 
> # Use rspec-core until rspec are migrated to RSpec 2.x
> BuildRequires: rubygem(rspec-core)
> 
> and in you %check section, if you are not using Rake, replace call to 'spec' 
> with 'rspec'. As an example, you can take a look on one of mine rubygems, 
> e.g. rubygem-regin, rubygem-pg.
> 
> Once we will migrate all packages into RSpec 2.x, we can migrate also the 
> rubygem-rspec and change the BR back to rubygem(rspec).
> 
> 
> Vit
> 
> 
> -------- Původní zpráva --------
> Předmět:      Re: aeolus conductor / rails 3 / F16 integration path
> Datum:        Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:47:36 -0400
> Od:   Mo Morsi <mmo...@redhat.com>
> Komu: Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com>
> 
> > It is currently 24 packages which are using RSpec 1.x:
> > 
> > ]$ repoquery --repoid=fedora-source --arch=src --whatrequires
> > 'rubygem(rspec)'
> > rubygem-bcrypt-ruby-0:2.1.2-2.fc15.src    (mmorsi)
> > rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0:0.9.1-1.fc15.src  (goldmann)
> > rubygem-boxgrinder-core-0:0.3.1-1.fc15.src (goldmann)
> > rubygem-commander-0:4.0.3-4.fc15.src  (mfojtik)
> > rubygem-cucumber-0:0.10.0-5.fc15.src  (mmorsi, clalance, mfojtik)
> > rubygem-cucumber-rails-0:0.3.2-5.fc15.src  (mmorsi, clalance, mfojtik)
> > rubygem-facon-0:0.4.1-2.fc15.src    (stahnma)
> > rubygem-factory_girl-0:1.3.2-3.fc15.src    (mfojtik)
> > rubygem-ffi-0:0.6.3-2.fc15.src   (bkearney)
> > rubygem-linode-0:0.6.2-1.fc15.src   (stahnma)
> > rubygem-mail-0:2.2.15-2.fc15.src - upstream at 1.3.x   (vondruch)
> > rubygem-multimap-0:1.1.2-3.fc15.src - upstream at 1.3.x  (mmorsi)
> > rubygem-mustache-0:0.11.2-5.fc15.src - doesn't use RSpec at all. Seems to 
> > be wrong dependency    (vondruch)
> > rubygem-rack-test-0:0.5.4-1.fc15.src    (mfojtik)
> > rubygem-rake-compiler-0:0.7.8-1.fc15.src    (mamoru)
> > rubygem-regin-0:0.3.7-3.fc15.src - upstream at 2.x   (vondruch)
> > rubygem-rerun-0:0.5.2-4.fc15.src     (mfojtik)
> > rubygem-scruffy-0:0.2.6-2.fc15.src   (mmorsi)
> > rubygem-simple-navigation-0:3.0.0-3.fc15.src   (mfojtik)
> > rubygem-thin-0:1.2.7-2.fc15.src   (mfojtik)
> > rubygem-typhoeus-0:0.2.0-2.fc15.src  (mfojtik)
> > rubygem-uuidtools-0:2.1.1-1.fc14.src  (mmorsi)
> > rubygem-warden-0:1.0.3-4.fc15.src - upstream at 2.x  (vondruch)
> > rubygem-yard-0:0.5.3-3.fc14.src  (mmorsi)
> > 
> > So from my packages, 2 can be converted into RSpec 2.x right now, 2 are
> > using 1.3, so it would need some effort and 1 seems to be just wrong
> > dependency. May be we should move this discussion into ruby-sig ML
> 
> 
> I appended the package owners onto the list for future reference.
> 
> Agree on moving this conversation to ruby-sig.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

Reply via email to