Mo Morsi wrote, at 07/15/2011 11:15 AM +9:00: > On 07/13/2011 02:53 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> Since February, there are available RSpec 2.x in Fedora repositories. >> However, as of now, the main package rubygem-rspec was not migrated to >> RSpec 2.x and still provides RSpec 1.3 functionality. It would be nice, >> if we could finish the migration to RSpec 2.x lets say in F17 time >> frame. What are your opinions? The list of packages which depends on >> RSpec 1.3 is attached bellow. >> > > IMO F17 seems like a reasonable timeline for this. At that point we > might also want to provide a rubygem-rspec1-compat package for any gems > whose upstream communities haven't switched over. >
Can't we do this (i.e. rspec 2 by default, rspec 1 move to compat mode) before F-16/17 branch (i.e. 2011-07-26)? I prepared rubygem-rspec-2.6.0 and rubygem-"rspec1"-1.3.2: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Trial-rpms/rubygem-rspec-2.6.0-1.fc.src.rpm http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Trial-rpms/rubygem-rspec1-1.3.2-2.fc.src.rpm http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Trial-rpms/rubygem-rspec.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Trial-rpms/rubygem-rspec1.spec With these rpms, - people who wants to use rspec 1 has to specify it as (Build)Requires: rubygem(rspec1), rubygem(rspec), and to use "gem 'rspec1'", not "gem 'rspec'". /usr/bin/spec remains as before. - people who want to use rspec 2 will specify it as (Build)Requires: rubygem(rspec), and "gem 'rspec'". Note that /usr/bin/rspec is (already) in rubygem-rspec-core-2.6.4. If we can agree with these changes, I will submit these specs/srpms for review requests. Regards, Mamoru _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
