Dne 23. 12. 20 v 11:06 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
----- Original Message -----From: "Vít Ondruch" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 1:16:12 PM Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0Hi everybody, Here is another snapshot build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58026964Hello, TL;DR: Build failures occuring with Ruby 3.0. Important: please check the end of my email, even if your package does not fail.
Nice, thx a lot!
I've rebuilt ruby in my COPR, and with it the rubygem packages. I've analyzed changes needed / builds failing, as follows. I've focused on packages, which depend on ruby-devel, and also some additional failures detected while doing mass test-rebuilds. Sucessful rebuilds are not mentioned. You can look up the package build in pvalena/rubygems-testing COPR, f.e. for eventmachine: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/package/rubygem-eventmachine/ This error message (in tests): ``` <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:85:in `require': /usr/lib64/gems/ruby/glib2-3.4.3/glib2.so: undefined symbol: rb_cData - /usr/lib64/gems/ruby/glib2-3.4.3/glib2.so (LoadError) from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:85:in `require' from /usr/share/gems/gems/glib2-3.4.3/lib/glib2.rb:117:in `<top (required)>' from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:85:in `require' from /usr/share/gems/gems/gobject-introspection-3.4.3/lib/gobject-introspection.rb:17:in `<top (required)>' ``` rubygem-atk rubygem-gio2 rubygem-gobject-introspection rubygem-gstreamer Bootstrapping needed (I didn't have time to resolve the bootstrap for my test repo): rubygem-cairo rubygem-cairo-gobject rubygem-gdk3 rubygem-pango rubygem-poppler rubygem-gdk_pixbuf2 rubygem-goocanvas1 rubygem-goocanvas rubygem-gtk2 rubygem-gtk3 rubygem-gtksourceview2 rubygem-gtksourceview3 rubygem-rsvg2 rubygem-vte3 rubygem-vte Webrick needed (new package in review): rubygem-ethon rubygem-curb rubygem-httpclient rubygem-typhoeus rubygem-rack rubygem-jekyll rubygem-excon rubygem-rubygems-mirror rubygem-mechanize rubygem-yard Test failure (inspection needed): rubygem-eventmachine rubygem-mysql2 ``` NoMethodError: undefined method `encode' for URI:Module │ ``` rubygem-sup ``` Error: test_range(Func): FrozenError: can't modify frozen Range: 0..0 ``` rubygem-ox gem build issues (with extension): rubygem-posix-spawn rubygem-syck ``` TypeError: no implicit conversion of Hash into Integer ``` rubygem-raindrops https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-ruby-libvirt/pull-request/2 rubygem-ruby-libvirt ``` LoadError: cannot load such file -- rexml/ ``` rubygem-webrobots rubygem-selenium-webdriver rubygem-faraday rubygem-rest-client rubygem-mini_magick rubygem-webmock rubygem-crack rubygem-activesupport rubygem-cucumber-core rubygem-maruku rubygem-actionpack rubygem-actionmailbox rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm
It would be helpful to open upstream tickets for these, because upstreams will need to cope with this as well. While ReXml is going to be available with all Ruby installations, it has to be mentioned in .gemspec files otherwise Bundler won't load it. Would you mind to check with upstreams prior we take any action?
And there are certainly upstream which are dealing with the issues already: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/f624ed09abba4a0bae64eb699c9fc2e3f9bdc2dcIn such cases we should cherry pick the patches rather then blindly adding the dependencies.
All changes are in private-ruby-3.0 branch. I think I should be able to prepare one more snapshot tomorrow and that should be it prior Ruby 3.0 release. This is the last change to upstream your changes ;)I'm preparing pull requests with changes on src.fedoraproject.org for some of the packages. Some of them are not created yet. Please check it before you start fixing the package yourself. One question for the "sucessful" rebuilds, for all: should I create pull requests with the rebuild release bump?
I don't think it would help, because creating PRs now won't test the packages against Ruby 3.0 and at the time of mass rebuild, it would slow down the rebuild.
Vít
Benefits are: - Can be subsequently picked up, after merge (or "LGTM", with permissions granted to me), and automatically rebuilt by my script. - CI runs, either custom or at least simple-koji-ci. Also, you know it was pre-tested by me in COPR. - Less work for packagers.) Which packages? (Failed packages included.) https://gist.github.com/pvalena/422c77868e929fe38c8bc325a765f8a8 Generated using script: https://gist.github.com/pvalena/76560097815fe6544c9bc4905e6bf7a1Regards, PavelVít_______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
OpenPGP_0x0CE09EE79917B87C.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
