On Wednesday 05 April 2006 07:20 pm, David Corbin wrote: > On Wednesday 05 April 2006 06:41 pm, you wrote: > > Either way, this is a method that gets picked up by RemoteTestRunner. > > I know its not a defined method. It is however found in the > > ObjectSpace by RemoteTestRunner because of its superclass. So should > > the RemoteTestRunner only pick up methods beginning with test_* or an > > option for exclusions? > > That's what Test::Unit does normally, if your not building your test suite > 'manually' (which I doubt anyone ever really does). Look at line 46 of > test/unit/testcase.rb does.
Actually, a slight correction the pattern is /^test./ > > Exactly what 'parameters' are specified in the test launch? I think this already works right if you just specify files. It's when you specify a class explicitly that things 'get wonky'. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Rubyeclipse-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development
