On Jun 16, 1:27 pm, Frederick Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 16 Jun 2007, at 16:51, John W. Long wrote: > > Is that not 10 times cleaner and easier to navigate? Now I can `mate > > app/comments` to work on a single controller and related views. > > Sure that's nice and easy to look at, but it rather assumes that you > can take each model and assign it to a controller. The rails apps I > work on would not fit so easily into that schema: many models have > dependencies on other models, many controllers pull together several > models. A lot of our models would have to either somehow live in 3 > different places or I'd somehow have to arbitrarily pick one > controller/component as the 'master' one for that model. Other models > don't have corresponding controllers at all.
That's not necessarily true. For those models you could drop them in the "app/application" folder with "application_controller.rb" or even in a standard "shared" directory. There are any number of ways of doing it and keeping it clean. -- John Long http://wiseheartdesign.com http://radiantcms.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
