I agree with David. I think that the Rails development team should now develop more high-level reuse of the sub-set than changing all the base Rails was created.
I am not saying that the "Django-style" is bad, I really like it. But Rails-style is nice and cool to, so why change something that work for another thing that work too, but in another way? Júlio Santos Monteiro - http://monteiro.eti.br On 15 jun, 19:29, DHH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've written an article suggesting some radical changes to the Rails > > directory structure for Rails 2.0 and am curious to know the core > > team's thoughts about it: > > Thanks for thinking about this John, but I don't see Rails adopting > something along those lines right now. We can definitely do more to > improve high-level reuse for the sub-set of users who need it, but it > probably won't be setting the tone quite as dramatically as this. I > much prefer to have things divided by type when I'm just working on a > single application. And anything that includes prefixing underscores > is a visual non-starter for me ;). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
