Oh goodie, so this is being taken care of after all? I hope my redundant report has drawn some more attention to this. I mean, with the emphasis on test-based development, the tests should be rather important, yes?
I hope this patch, or a better fix, is adopted soon! On Jul 3, 2:38 pm, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:46:00PM -0000, Nick wrote: > > I'd like to get to work patching ActionPack, but there's an > > unfortunate annoyance stopping me for now. > > > I've described it here:http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8849 > > > The gist of it is that render_test.rb and new_render_test.rb define > > conflicting types for Customer, and thus effect each other. I haven't > > This sounds an awful lot likehttp://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8714. > > - Matt > > -- > When the revolution comes, they won't be able to FIND the wall. > -- Brian Kantor, in the Monastery --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
