> Would the ideal solution to this be to make capture work with nested > calls?
I'm not sure what approach you'd use to make that work, as the capture helper at present already does some 'funky' stuff. However if you can make it work, I can't see the harm in such a patch being applied. -- Cheers Koz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
