> We'd gain support for other adapters, however, I don't really care > that much as I'm stick with Mongrel for now.
We already have fastcgi, and thin can already run a rails app? Again I can see the nice idea, but right now it doesn't necessarily buy us anything. Should that change, perhaps it's worth looking into. > But, yeah, I was > wondering the same thing, are there any speed advantages? Seems like > everyone is always bashing the built in CGI lib. Everyone beating up on something isn't a particularly reliable predictor for it being slow, or poorly implemented. Again, if there's a compelling benefit maybe we change. -- Cheers Koz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
