Object#tap needs a block. Joao
On Apr 9, 4:10 pm, Anuj Dutta <dutta.a...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 9 April 2010 16:56, Joao Carlos <m...@joao-carlos.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I just came across a situation where it would be extremely handy to > > have a method that returns the receiver. > > > Imagine the following example: > > > filter = %w(with_votes without_votes).include?(params[:filter]) ? > > params[:filter].to_sym : :self > > Idea.published.send(filter).all > > > The implementation would be pretty simple: > > > class Object > > def self > > self > > end > > end > > > Should this be a part of Rails? > > Doesn't tap method in 1.9 do that already? > > Anuj > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-c...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<rubyonrails-core%2Bunsubscrib > > e...@googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > > -- > Anuj DUTTA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-c...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
