Thanks, Yehuda.
Shouldn't this be added to rails new generator? I run rails new --help
before asking here. Here is the result:
---
Usage: /home/rodrigo/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.8.7-p...@site_heroku/bin/rails
/path/to/your/app [options]
Options:
-r, --ruby=path Path to the Ruby binary of your
choice (otherwise scripts use env, dispatchers current path).
Default:
/home/rodrigo/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.8.7-p174/bin/ruby
-d, --database=name Preconfigure for selected database
(options: mysql/oracle/postgresql/sqlite2/sqlite3/frontbase/ibm_db).
Default: sqlite3
-D, --with-dispatchers Add CGI/FastCGI/mod_ruby
dispatches code to generated application skeleton
Default: false
--freeze Freeze Rails in vendor/rails from
the gems generating the skeleton
Default: false
-m, --template=path Use an application template that
lives at path (can be a filesystem path or URL).
Default: (none)
Rails Info:
-v, --version Show the Rails version number and
quit.
-h, --help Show this help message and quit.
General Options:
-p, --pretend Run but do not make any changes.
-f, --force Overwrite files that already exist.
-s, --skip Skip files that already exist.
-q, --quiet Suppress normal output.
-t, --backtrace Debugging: show backtrace on errors.
-c, --svn Modify files with subversion.
(Note: svn must be in path)
-g, --git Modify files with git. (Note: git
must be in path)
Description:
The 'rails' command creates a new Rails application with a default
directory structure and configuration at the path you specify.
Example:
rails ~/Code/Ruby/weblog
This generates a skeletal Rails installation in ~/Code/Ruby/weblog.
See the README in the newly created application to get going.
---
Maybe these "skip-*" should be added to this output... WDYT?
And please, thank Leah for the RSoC T-Shirt. It fitted great. I'm not
sure if she has received my e-mail...
Best regards,
Rodrigo.
Em 24-07-2010 16:57, Yehuda Katz escreveu:
rails new myapp --skip-active-record
:-D
Yehuda Katz
Architect | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
<rr.ro...@gmail.com <mailto:rr.ro...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Is there any way to prevent Rails 3 from using an ORM? In Rails
2, it used to have a description in environments.rb explaining how
to do that.
In Rails 3, is there any way to tell it to not use any database? I
was trying to make some benchmarks from situations that don't
require a database...
Thanks in advance,
Rodrigo.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
<mailto:rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com>.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:rubyonrails-core%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-c...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on
Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-c...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
