On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Ernie Miller <er...@metautonomo.us> wrote: > In my opinion, the Rails version number should reflect the changes to > the Rails API. The user-facing API did not see major changes due to > the ARel rewrite.
I agree with Ernie here, while the ARel changes are huge they're largely user-facing compatible, and for the rails api they're completely compatible. Barring bugs (and I believe we've found one) everything should work just fine. Because of that, the tiny version number bump seems appropriate. -- Cheers Koz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-c...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.