Any thoughts on this from core members, perhaps? On Friday, July 20, 2012 10:25:20 AM UTC-7, davidcelis wrote: > > Yep, the point I've been getting at. People shouldn't blindly upgrade > their Rails versions anyway, and when they see errors that a Controller > can't be found based on their Model name or vice versa, it should be pretty > obvious as to what's going on unless they're clueless about the inflector. > > On Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:01:29 PM UTC-7, pavling wrote: >> >> On 19 July 2012 20:48, Colin Law <clan...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > On 19 July 2012 20:07, Linus Pettersson <linus.petters...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> At least they should fix the ones that are incorrect... >> >> >> >> "Octopus".pluralize should return "Octopuses" and NOT "Octopi"... :) >> > >> > But then all those applications that rely on the current pluralisation >> > of octopus would break when upgraded. Innumerable applications around >> > the internet would come to their knees. >> >> :-) >> >> Surely all those sites' developers could just override the inflector >> back to what it used to be, and get on with all the other tasks they >> need to complete to upgrade to Rails4? >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-talk/-/CbGz6IpxEsEJ. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
