Guys, lets keep in mind that I meant for this discussion to be about how the inflection rules themselves are bad. Not how they're used internally with Rails, but how the file that defines these rules is an utter mess.
On Thursday, August 2, 2012 8:30:33 AM UTC-7, paulie wrote: > > index: GET /media > show: GET /media/1 > edit: GET /media/1/edit > create: POST /media > update: PUT /media/1 > new: GET /media/new > delete: DELETE /media > > I wasn't suggesting changing this retroactively, I was supporting the > idea of the inflections gem, which would allow an replacement that > didn't require duplicating all the rules in javascript. > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Matt Jones <al2o...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > For bonus points, how would the new behavior distinguish between the > 'show' > > and 'index' actions? (currently plural-with-no-args vs. > > singular-with-one-arg) > > > > I suspect you're going to face a lot of pushback from all the developers > who > > *have* managed to "keep it straight", since your suggestion involves > > breaking every one of their applications. > > > > --Matt Jones > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-talk/-/DxZAM_qvm1cJ. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
