Perhaps I'm bing a bit thick and missing something obvious (possible), but I found the caveats listed in section 3.5 of the Associations Rails Guide<http://guides.rubyonrails.org/association_basics.html> badly worded and confusing.
The section gives an example with a has_many <-> belongs_to relationship is setup with inverse associations on both side, but then states the caveat*"For belongs_to associations, has_many inverse associations are ignored." * Could someone actually explain what that means in concrete terms? The example and the caveat appear to be contradictory. If the caveat is correct then I'm not sure I understand how the example works. Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-talk/-/X0zTnP1Dc4gJ. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
