> No, 80,000 rows is a *tiny* database. You should absolutely not need to > split the table--stick with a clean design that mirrors a sensible > understanding of the data, don't mess it up by trying to accommodate > imaginary performance concerns. >
Ah. Got it. I'll leave the table alone then. Thank you Scott! -- arslan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/da739534-0610-4e26-a4a0-d0faaaf76e7d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
