On Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 11:11:41 PM UTC+1, Elizabeth McGurty wrote:
>
> I have build an application.  My shared web server is with DreamHost.   
> The permitted Rails version is 3.0.3, and permitted Ruby version is 1.8.7.  
>
> With this information, when I recently announced here that I had made some 
> progress in better utilizing table associations, a member here, Colin Law, 
> responded:
>
> "Rails 3.0 is long obsolete and, I believe, no longer receives even 
> security updates, it should not be used for production applications."
>
> What are the facts here?   Are none of you using Rails 3.x?
>
>
You've had some answers about rails, but ruby 1.8.7 is also no longer 
receiving security updates from the ruby core team (some linux 
distributions are back porting security fixes).

Even if you are stuck on rails 3.0.x, you really don't want to use 3.0.3 - 
the last in that series was 3.0.20 - you're missing out on nearly 2.5 years 
of bug fixes & security fixes,such as

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/61bkgvnSGTQ
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/DCNTNp_qjFM
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/l4L0TEVAz1k

You are almost certainly vulnerable to remote code execution, sql injection 
etc.

Fred

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/e8c8fa11-0b40-48b5-917b-a86490a94a1f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to