React can run on the server, but it is not mandatory. You can just use it in the browser if you want.
Em sexta-feira, 17 de julho de 2015 22:44:00 UTC-3, Jedrin escreveu: > > > I have used Ember.JS a good deal over the past year as well as a little > Angular. I found Ember to have some cool concepts and I liked writing > mixins in Ember, but something about Ember seems very complex to me and I > have felt like I wanted something simpler to work with. I have felt that > Rails has been slipping a bit and the popularity of Rails has not been > growing as fast as I had once hoped for. Because of that I have had to > focus more on JavaScript and JS frameworks. > > I watched a video of Jing Chen on the Facebook team explain problems > with MVC complexity. I felt like what she was saying made alot of sense and > I have heard that React.JS can do alot for a simple library. > > I found this post which explains different ways of using React.JS with > Rails and Flex. (Flex is the MC in MVC and React is the V), however they > all seem to have pros and cons and it is not clear what is the best > approach. The third approach seems to be to use two servers, Rails and > Node. That does not seem optimal at all. > > > http://www.openmindedinnovations.com/blogs/3-ways-to-integrate-ruby-on-rails-react-flux > > It seems like to use Flex you need to use Node, so it appears if I want to > learn more about Flex then I have to possibly focus more on Node as a > server .. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/329ce52c-0095-4ca3-b252-deb3fb13a3d0%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
