He meant Flux <http://facebook.github.io/flux/> (not Flex), an architecture for React.
I've used it and found it much better than MVC, but server rendering is not required. Em segunda-feira, 20 de julho de 2015 16:25:45 UTC-3, Ruby-Forum.com User escreveu: > > Hi Jedrin, > > what is wrong with react-rails? > You can put ReactJS in vendor folder and use it as you would typically > use it in any other web app. > > PS. I have no idea what is flex and do not see any issue with MVC. > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/14b71cbb-4ec4-4a8b-81c7-c1196df3f26c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.