He meant Flux <http://facebook.github.io/flux/> (not Flex), an architecture 
for React.

I've used it and found it much better than MVC, but server rendering is not 
required.


Em segunda-feira, 20 de julho de 2015 16:25:45 UTC-3, Ruby-Forum.com User 
escreveu:
>
> Hi Jedrin, 
>
> what is wrong with react-rails? 
> You can put ReactJS in vendor folder and use it as you would typically 
> use it in any other web app. 
>
> PS. I have no idea what is flex and do not see any issue with MVC. 
>
> -- 
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/14b71cbb-4ec4-4a8b-81c7-c1196df3f26c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to