Julian Leviston wrote: > It's bad practice to have an association or method called type because > ruby already defines > One IMHO > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 02/02/2009, at 6:48 PM, Rasmus Nielsen > <rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net
I agree - but I'll use it anyway because of the following reasons: 1) Object#type is being deprecated (use #class instead) 2) I cannot find a synonym to type that does describe the entity as well as "type" does 3) It works flawlessly ;-) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
