It's bad practice to have an association or method called type because ruby already defines One IMHO
Sent from my iPhone On 02/02/2009, at 6:48 PM, Rasmus Nielsen <rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net > wrote: > > Wouter de Bie wrote: >> Rasmus Nielsen wrote: >> >>> Yes I know - but why doesn't >>> >>> belongs_to :blah, :class_name => "ItemType" >>> >>> ... not work then? >> >> >> Does it work when you explicitly define the foreign_key? > > Xinit and Michael: thank you. > > It worked after specifying the foreign key explicitly. This saved me a > big headache! Thank you very much! :-) > > Should I file this surprising behavior as a bug? > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
