Phlip wrote: > it says right here! well if it said it on the interwebs, then it *must* be true.
lol in all seriousness, take a look at first few paragraphs. there are an awful lot of qualifiers. ie, "this article *tries* to demonstrate"... "I prefer" comes up a lot... At the end of the day, this is going to depend on your style, preferences, and what you're used to. But I can make my judgement simply by *looking* at the page. It's poorly constructed. When I loaded it, it sent me to the very bottom (to the "Top Stories" portion). The design is cluttered and certainly not streamlined. Portions of the page are cut off. finally, there's personal experience. I can't believe that anyone who has designed and implemented webapps in Java and Ruby on Rails could possibly argue that Java is faster/easier/more straightforward (that is to say -- I have designed and built webapps in both. Rails was waaaaay faster for me). Furthermore I find that the Ruby language is more concise and intuitive (in general -- there are one or two exceptions). -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
