I couldn't have said it better than Robert.
On May 27, 11:11 am, Robert Walker <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Phlip wrote:
> >http://java.sys-con.com/node/965189
>
> > I am certainly going back to Java, just as soon as I figure out how to
> > configure
> > Tomcat.
>
> > Until then, anyone care to take on this logic? Has anyone here used Java
> > the way
> > they say they should?
>
> Here is my biggest problem with the entire article:
>
> "Model Driven Framework"
>
> My day job is as a Java developer, and I can testify that this is the
> line of thinking of most Java developers I know. In my opinion "Model
> Driven" design is exactly upside-down. End users don't care one bit
> about how beautiful, or elegant, your model code is. They don't want to
> see a user interface that exposes the design of the model.
>
> What users care about is the experience. The interface that allows them
> to accomplish whatever task is at hand. If that means pulling data from
> 20 different model objects and mashing them together on a single page,
> then so be it. The tools the developers use must be able to support
> whatever presentation makes sense for the end user, not for themselves
> to make development life easy.
>
> This is a line of thinking that Ruby on Rails confirmed for me as a
> developer.
>
> http://gettingreal.37signals.com/ch09_Interface_First.php
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
