Luke van der Hoeven wrote: > what does the constructor method do differently in 1.8 vs. 1.9? Does it > exist in 1.8 or 1.9? Currently working with 1.8.x so I'm not sure my > constructors will be able to do it without that extra code. >
It wasnt' the initialize() method that I didn't like, it was the to_params() non-dry hack which made me feel a little ill.. The method I provided is not maintainable as adding attributes to the class will break the 'serialization' mechanism.. a much better solution would be to use reflection to run through your attributes and map them (which is slightly different in 1.9 as compared to 1.8) ilan -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
