On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser <rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net> wrote: > Patrick Doyle wrote: > True to a point. Have you played around with anything else out there > (RSpec?)? Not yet... My applications and their associated tests have been trivial and mostly been used as a learning tool for myself. I have seen references to RSpec, Cucumber, and several other test platforms.
I am quite certain that they all address needs that aren't met by the standard unit/functional/integration tests baked into RoR. But I figure that that, if the standard unit/functional/integration tests are good enough for the RoR developers, they should be good enough for me. I am assuming (of course) that the RoR developers use the standard test templates. If they don't, then why is that template (still) included in RoR? It's probably included because it was standard at some point in time, and works well enough for small, simple projects. Which are all I've played with so far. As my projects get bigger or more complicated, then I'll probably run into the same limitations that inspired the other test environments and learn from that process. --wpd --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
