Greg Donald wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Cameron Vessey <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I read the docs for 3 hours and 2 diferent reference books.. not one >> told me that adding a map.resource :(controller) to routes would make it >> so you couldn't use the URL to navigate. > > Docs don't usually tell you what you can't do with a resource, they > usually just explain what you CAN do with a resource. *shrug* > >> Why would I use restful if I have no clue how to use restful? > > I would use restful routes simply because they are the default. In > Rails3 you must either choose to use REST or plan to write a ton of > (work-around) code in routes.rb. Why fight it? REST works great. > Wrap your head around what :member and :collection are for and you got > 99% of it down. > > > -- I was taught ruby on rails about a year and a half ago I think it was ruby 2 .... I've been programming in C# for the last 8 months and it pretty much turned any thing I knew about ruby on Rails to mush > Greg Donald > destiney.com | gregdonald.com
-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
