Colin Law wrote in post #955070: > On 18 October 2010 04:38, Marnen Laibow-Koser <li...@ruby-forum.com> > wrote: >> Rahul J. wrote in post #954924: >>> [...] >>> Also i am not preffering associations to get the complete user field, as >>> its not being needed. >> >> Then you are most likely being stupid. > > I think that is a bit harsh Marnen, one can be misguided through lack > of knowledge without being stupid. >
You're right, it was harsh, and if it was too much so then I apologize. I wouldn't have been that harsh except that the OP repeatedly said that he didn't want to do this with associations -- that is, that he didn't want to do it right -- and the reasons he gave were such that I believe he didn't understand how associations worked and was rejecting them for the wrong reasons. I chose strong language to attempt to snap him out of his stubbornness. Whether it was the right choice or not is another question. :) > Colin Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
