On 7 November 2011 19:32, Dave Aronson <googlegroups2d...@davearonson.com> wrote: > So, aside from declaring one more class, there's no reason not to use > hmt from the start.
Ok, that's good, if I need or not to attach information to the relationship I can always use has_many :through. Can you suggest a name for the :through model between Company and LegalRepresentative? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
