Thanks Michael. On Thursday, July 14, 2011, Michael Anstis <michael.ans...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe there was some talk of this recently (on perhaps the drools-dev > mailing list). > > IIRC it concluded that this was the expected (system) behaviour of not > necessarily the expected (user) behaviour. > > > 2011/7/14 Wishing Carebear <wishing.careb...@gmail.com> > > Thanks Esteban, > > Noticed that if I have an employee with the list of addresses and update an > attribute of the address item in the list, modify does not work and the > update needs to be called explicitly on the Employee to take effect. Is this > expected. > > > > 2011/7/14 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.alive...@gmail.com> > > No matter the ruleflow-group, all your rules are running in the same > session. If you modify the attributes of a fact, you must notify it to the > session (if you want to make inference with this new value). For doing so you > can use update() or modify(), they will have the same result. > > > > > Best regards, > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > Esteban Aliverti > - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com <http://www.plugtree.com> > - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com > > > 2011/7/13 Wishing Carebear <wishing.careb...@gmail.com> > > > > > modify > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
