On 28/12/2011 20:31, drools.user wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > We are one month away from pushing our code into Production. So, I don't > think we will be able to move to 5.4 beta 1. Even though code change > involved might be minimal, it has to go through full testing cycle which is > very time consuming. Also, I don't think Management will put a beta release > into Production. give 5.3 a try. > > Is there any workaround to address those listeners issue in 5.2 itself? What > exactly is the function of listeners and can we tweek our implementation to > limit the number of listener objects? lots came up on this for the mailing lists, search it. > > Also, what about the object size increase with Drools 5? Is that expected? we have no data to know either way. If people can show examples that demonstrate different sizes across JVMs > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-Memory-Issues-tp3615095p3617252.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
