So, from documentation, does the explicit expiration work when we don't use time operator.
Thanks, Matteo Cusmai Il giorno 29/mag/2012 08:20, "Wolfgang Laun" <wolfgang.l...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > This quote is from the current version of "Fusion": > > "The above example declares an expiration offset of 30 minutes for > StockTick events. After that time, assuming no rule still needs the > event, the engine will expire and remove the event from the session > automatically." > > The catch is, as you may have noticed, the clause: "assuming no rule > still needs the event". Whatever this means... > > An educated guess for interpretation for "a rule needs an event" would > be "a partially or fully completed activation of a rule holds a > reference to an event". But, since the author hasn't added this > explanation, it might be something else. > > -W > > > On 28/05/2012, Matteo Cusmai <cusmaimat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > i have noticed a strange behavior, but i am not sure that i depend on > > drools or depend by my bad knowledge of it. > > I am using drools fusion and i have a lot of classes with role event. I > > have put them the expiration value to 5 minutes. > > >From my understanding, if i use explicit expiration, as i do, when it > pass > > 5 minutes and that event is out of scope of all my rules, that event is > > deleted. > > But, i noticed that the last event hasn't retracted after 5 minutes and > > this behavior makes the system no stable, because it works differently > > after some minutes. > > > > If i don't use explicit expiration, the system seems to work fine, so i > am > > however happy, but i would like to understand the issue. > > Thanks a lot, > > Matteo. > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users