On 02/05/2013 10:53 AM, Tim Chevalier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Tim Chevalier <catamorph...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Brian Anderson <bander...@mozilla.com> wrote:
Greetings, folks,
There was some discussion about bug triage in the meeting today so I went to
do some and was reminded of how frustrated I get by our labels: there are a
lot of them and I usually can't find an `A-` label that matches the bug. I
have some proposals here to remove a lot of them and add a few. Any
objections?
Yes, please!
Add:
A-parser
A-tools
A-concurrency - replaces A-comm/A-parallel
A-infrastructure
Remove:
A-classes - obsolete
A-comm - use A-concurrency
A-frontend - catchall - existing issues have no obvious relationship. use
A-parser, A-syntaxext instead, A-driver instead
A-editors - use A-tools
A-infer - not used much - use A-typesystem
A-kindchk - obsolete
A-linearity - use A-typesystem
A-liveness - use A-typesystem
A-packaging - use A-tools
A-parallel - use A-concurrency
A-servo - not many issues
A-typestate
A-unsafe
A-unwind
A-versioning
A-website - use A-infrastructure
A-rustbot - use A-infrastructure
A-cyclecollector
A-github
I actually support breaking up the A-typesystem label into fewer
labels. I find myself using typesystem a lot when I want something
more specific, actually.
Er, I meant "more labels".
I suggested removing a few that weren't being used much (classes, infer,
kindchk, linearity, typestate). Is the division here just wrong? After
removing those I suggest it looks like just A-typesystem and A-regions
remain. Are there hot areas in the type system that we're missing labels
for?
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
