On 4/25/2013 10:53 AM, Patrick Walton wrote:I'm not sure we can do the latter. There are too many issues relating to `unsafe`, `loop`, the `self` argument, etc. to make the LL(1) derivable from the human-readable grammar in an automated fashion, in my eyes.Total bikeshed... but why is "continue" spelled "loop" in Rust? Especially if it's causing problems? Rust is the only language [1] that uses "loop" to mean "continue". It seems like an arbitrary incompatibility with C/C++/Java/JS/etc. Erik [1] http://rigaux.org/language-study/syntax-across-languages/CntrFlow.html#CntrFlowBrkCntFlo |
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
