Are explicit `mod`s too heavyweight for this?
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Niko Matsakis <n...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > I often find when writing code that I want to introduce "sections" > into my file. Typically I do this like: > > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > // Node construction > // > // Methods for constructing new nodes. > > I find this helpful when browsing through the code. I imagine > something similar would be helpful when browsing through rustdocs. > Maybe we can find a way to incorporate some sort of "section" > to use when grouping items, methods, fields, etc. I imagine > we could draw on Markdown's `#`, `##`, `###` notation to > define sections, subsections, and so forth, but I'm just > not sure how we would let rustdoc know about it, since there > is nothing in particular to attach the attribute to. > > Any thoughts? Is this something other people would like? > > > Niko > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > Rust-dev@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
