That is a really good article and a very valid point. Writing down all the feedback for future reference in my development.
Thanks FF, Luis On 13 September 2013 17:13, Flaper87 <flape...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 2013/9/13 Luis de Bethencourt <l...@debethencourt.com> > >> Cool! >> >> Great and awesome feedback. The summary is that Joda-Time is what we >> should aspire to have. >> >> My goal is to first cover the "most common use cases", and as Corey says, >> "easy to use correctly". >> >> After that I can start considering the corner cases like bya and mya. >> Which sound very fun and interesting, but not high priority. >> Hopefully by then I won't be too consumed by the question of what is Time. >> > > > Another thing that I'd like to see there is a good handling of TZs. Many > datetime libraries got that wrong. Here's a blog post Armin wrote that may > be helpful. > > http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2011/7/15/eppur-si-muove/ > > Thanks for taking care of this. > FF > > -- > Flavio (@flaper87) Percoco > http://www.flaper87.com > http://github.com/FlaPer87 >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev