That is a really good article and a very valid point.

Writing down all the feedback for future reference in my development.

Thanks FF,
Luis


On 13 September 2013 17:13, Flaper87 <flape...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> 2013/9/13 Luis de Bethencourt <l...@debethencourt.com>
>
>> Cool!
>>
>> Great and awesome feedback. The summary is that Joda-Time is what we
>> should aspire to have.
>>
>> My goal is to first cover the "most common use cases", and as Corey says,
>> "easy to use correctly".
>>
>> After that I can start considering the corner cases like bya and mya.
>> Which sound very fun and interesting, but not high priority.
>> Hopefully by then I won't be too consumed by the question of what is Time.
>>
>
>
> Another thing that I'd like to see there is a good handling of TZs. Many
> datetime libraries got that wrong. Here's a blog post Armin wrote that may
> be helpful.
>
> http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2011/7/15/eppur-si-muove/
>
> Thanks for taking care of this.
> FF
>
> --
> Flavio (@flaper87) Percoco
> http://www.flaper87.com
> http://github.com/FlaPer87
>
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to