do you have suggestion ?

sphinx support for rust? It would require to switch to restructuredtext
syntax

-----
Gaetan



2013/11/14 Corey Richardson <[email protected]>

> We *do* do automatic generation. It uses the markdown in `doc`.
> tutorial.md, and rust.md is the manual.
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Gaetan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > good :)
> >
> > so, what is missing to have an automatic generation of html page from a
> > github page?
> >
> > -----
> > Gaetan
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/14 Corey Richardson <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> Travis could, but then anyone could (since the travis.yml is public
> >> and it'd need credentials to the repo). We have a buildbot,
> >> buildbot.rust-lang.org
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Gaetan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > do you have a buildbot or jenkins for the rust ?
> >> > I don't think travis could push html pages to a remote repository, do
> >> > it?
> >> >
> >> > -----
> >> > Gaetan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2013/11/14 Benjamin Striegel <[email protected]>
> >> >>
> >> >> I would welcome such an effort, and suggest that it live as its own
> >> >> project, outside of the Rust repo. We really aren't set up currently
> to
> >> >> handle rapid and frequent documentation changes. Once it gets to a
> >> >> reasonable level of maturity we could then give it a mention from the
> >> >> main
> >> >> tutorial, and then once it's ready we could replace the current
> >> >> tutorial
> >> >> entirely.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Gaetan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I would love helping on this matter, I'm use to setting up automatic
> >> >>> documentation generation (rst, sphinx, doxygen,...).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -----
> >> >>> Gaetan
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 2013/11/14 Philip Herron <[email protected]>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I would defineltly like to see a clone of the python tutorial
> because
> >> >>>> it
> >> >>>> really does it so well going inch by inch building up what way
> things
> >> >>>> work i
> >> >>>> am not a web developer but would love to write content i wonder is
> it
> >> >>>> possible to start a github project for this using sphinx i think it
> >> >>>> uses
> >> >>>> isn't it?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On 14 November 2013 15:38, Corey Richardson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Daniel Glazman
> >> >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>>> > The Tutorial is the entry point for all people willing to
> >> >>>>> > investigate
> >> >>>>> > Rust and/or contribute to Servo. I think that document is super
> >> >>>>> > precious, super-important. Unfortunately, I don't think it is
> >> >>>>> > really
> >> >>>>> > a
> >> >>>>> > tutorial but only a lighter manual. Examples are here even more
> >> >>>>> > important than in the case of the Manual above. A good Tutorial
> is
> >> >>>>> > often built around one single programming task that becomes more
> >> >>>>> > and
> >> >>>>> > more complex as more features of the language are read and
> >> >>>>> > known. Furthermore, the Tutorial has clearly adopted the
> language
> >> >>>>> > complexity of the reference manual, something that I think
> should
> >> >>>>> > be
> >> >>>>> > in general avoided. I also think all examples should be
> buildable
> >> >>>>> > and produce a readable result on the console even if that result
> >> >>>>> > is a
> >> >>>>> > build or execution error. That would drastically help the
> reader.
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>> > All in all, I think the Tutorial needs some love and probably a
> >> >>>>> > technical writer who is not working on the guts of Rust, someone
> >> >>>>> > who
> >> >>>>> > could vulgarize the notions of the Manual into an easy-to-read,
> >> >>>>> > simple-to-experiment, step-by-step tutorial and avoiding in
> >> >>>>> > general
> >> >>>>> > vocabulary inherited from programming language science.
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I agree, partially. I think "Rust for Rubyists" fills this role
> >> >>>>> quite
> >> >>>>> well for now. Generally I  think the language tutorial should not
> >> >>>>> try
> >> >>>>> to hide complexity or paper over things, at the very least so it
> can
> >> >>>>> be complete and correct. I think the Python tutorial is a good
> >> >>>>> benchmark. We might even be able to rip off the Python tutorial's
> >> >>>>> structure wholesale.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> The "on-boarding" process is still very rough. Maybe some sort of
> >> >>>>> live-comment system would work well for finding pain points, where
> >> >>>>> one
> >> >>>>> can add comments/feedback while reading the tutorial.
> >> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>>> Rust-dev mailing list
> >> >>>>> [email protected]
> >> >>>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>> Rust-dev mailing list
> >> >>>> [email protected]
> >> >>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> Rust-dev mailing list
> >> >>> [email protected]
> >> >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Rust-dev mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Rust-dev mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
> >> >
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to