Sorry for this offtopic subject.. Le 30 nov. 2013 20:20, "Benjamin Striegel" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > Is is possible to get rid of this returnless return? > > I mean, it is really hard yo read, why not enforcing the use of return > statement, always? > > This isn't the point of this thread, and also I don't think anybody is > willing to revisit this issue. Consider that ship as having sailed beyond > the horizon. > > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Gaetan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is is possible to get rid of this returnless return? >> >> I mean, it is really hard yo read, why not enforcing the use of return >> statement, always? >> Le 30 nov. 2013 19:59, "György Andrasek" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> On 11/30/2013 07:41 PM, Pierre Talbot wrote: >>> >>>> Do you have suggestions that could fit well for this kind of project? >>>> >>> >>> Make the following code compile: >>> >>> ``` >>> fn foo() { >>> bar() >>> fn bar() {} >>> } >>> ``` >>> >>> i.e. allow nested function declarations after a semicolonless return >>> expression. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Rust-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Rust-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
