Maybe I’m wrong, but I’m not sure this is accurate. rustdoc does all of this with libsyntax including jumping to the line of the actual source code for a symbol. Maybe it isn’t perfectly ideal for some tools, but I don’t think it is anywhere near a lost cause.
Eric On Mar 12, 2014, at 2:52 PM, Clark Gaebel <[email protected]> wrote: > > There is no accurate jump-to-definition, type retrieval, docstring > retrieval or semantic completion for Rust. The compiler was not built > with support for this kind of tooling in mind, and I seriously doubt > that anything but inaccurate hacks will exist for a *long* time. > > This worries me a lot. > > -- > Clark. > > Key ID : 0x78099922 > Fingerprint: B292 493C 51AE F3AB D016 DD04 E5E3 C36F 5534 F907 > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
