On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Steve Klabnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In case of trivial entities > > The problem with this is what's trivial to you isn't trivial to someone > else. > > > think about the amount of update this may make necessary in case Rust > language syntax changes. > > Literally my job. ;) Luckily, the syntax has been pretty stable > lately, and most changes have just been mechanical. > If you could, it would be awesome to invest in a check that the provided examples compile with the current release of the compiler (possibly as part of the documentation generation). This not only guarantees that the examples are up-to-date, but also helps in locating out-dated examples. On the other hand, this may require more boilerplate to get self-contained examples (that can actually be compiled), so YMMV. -- Matthieu > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
