On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Patrick Walton <pcwal...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> >> ... in C++. Not in Rust. That's because, unlike C++, Rust is designed > from the ground up to support moves and copies in a first class way. As a C++ dev, I feel the need to say THANK YOU for that. Rust being designed with first-class move support is a major feature for me; it's something I highlight when I talk about Rust with other C++ devs and it's universally applauded. > > > It's just strange that you can change the semantic of an already existing >> operation just by adding new capabilities. Adding traits should define new >> operations with new semantics, not changing the semantics of existing >> operations. At least that's how it works for all other traits, and >> deviating from that is at least surprising. >> > > Hence the Opt-In Built-In Traits proposal > > > Maybe the syntax was just too heavy? >> > > Any syntax at all is too much. I am convinced of that. > > Patrick > > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > Rust-dev@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
