On Sep 21, 2014, at 1:27 PM, Evan G <eg1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Personally, I feel "safety" generalizes pretty well to "any concept > that should be called out explicitly as unsafe"--not just memory > safety.
The difference is that the current uses of `unsafe` are guarding things that cause a program to not have a defined meaning (ignoring the fact that Rust has no real semantics yet, so arguably no program has a defined meaning), whereas these other uses are for programs that have a defined meaning, just not the one that was intended. Cameron _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
