My criticism is not that RMC did a feature (and as another member pointed out, 
they do this for other niche interests in the hobby periodically), but that the 
feature 
could have been much better; I consider it a missed opportunity which won't 
come again any time soon.

Jace Kahn

General Manager 
Ceres & Canisteo RR Co./Champlain County Traction Co.







> 
> I have not read all of the RMC  article but the overall coverage is a boost 
> for S.    
> Model railroader is an all computer oriented , (ready to run out of the box) 
> toy train magazine anymore. I wonder what Linn Westcott would say (knew him 
> well)?
> John Armstrong
> 
> TRAINS is back in the real world now. 

> 
>     
>   With all the broo-ha-ha about the RMC insert, I decided to dig it out of 
>   my pile of magazines waiting to be read. I read the first article and 
>   looked at all the ads and photos. So far I think it is a well-done 
>   piece. After reading all the comments about the overwhelming amount of 
>   AF coverage, I really didn't find that. Just my opinion, of course. My 
>   first impression was that I thought most of the ads were scale-oriented 
>   (I think two were specific for AF). I thought the first article (I'll 
>   read the second one this weekend) was a very good one to get everyone up 
>   to speed on the history of "S". The end of the article left with a 
>   positive and hopeful feeling, because it seemed to indicate that S is a 
>   growing scale. "So from an outsider's point of view, this scale called 
>   "S" might be something to investigate further." This is what I would've 
>   walked away with. I am glad it didn't mention anything about the China 
>   situation, otherwise it might have turned people off.
> 
>   By the way, I got an e-mail the other day from someone visiting my web 
>   site and reading the Railmaster Hobbies' RS-1 construction article on my 
>   web site. He said he isn't an S-scale modeler, but he is serious 
>   thinking about buying that kit so that he can build one.
> 
>   I wonder if the RMC article is going to have more people consider 
>   S-scale. I think so. Maybe this guy found my web site after he read the 
>   RMC article and did a generic search for S-related items on the web. I 
>   dunno.
> 
>   I agree with Andy and think this insert was a great idea and came out 
>   well. No other magazine is doing something like that. You also don't see 
>   a 16-page insert of "This is N-scale" or "This is G-scale". They singled 
>   out S, and I think that is fantastic.
>   - Peter.
> 
>   On 04/21/2011 1:20 am, Andrew_Malette wrote:
>   > Hi All,
>   >
>   > I thought the RMC feature was a good idea and went with it. I have not 
> seen
>   > the article or ads so I really can't comment on them but I am somewhat 
> taken
>   > back that many of you have critisized the handout. This handout will be
>   > distributed at many MR shows by RMC to promote S. I trust that your
>   > critiques are valid. I will have to look and decide for myself.
>   >
>   > cheers,
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   > Andy Malette
> 
>   -- 
>   Peter Vanvliet ([email protected], or [email protected])
>   Houston, Texas
> 
>   "It is easy to give up; anyone can do that..."
> 
>   http://pmrr.org/ (my model railroad - RSS feed <http://pmrr.org/rss.xml>)
>   http://fourthray.com/ (my company)
>   http://houstonsgaugers.org/ (model railroad club)
>   --
> 
>   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
>   __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
> signature database 6061 (20110421) __________
> 
>   The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
>   http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
> database 6061 (20110421) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
                                          

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to