--- In [email protected], "Michael" <wsmwrr@...> wrote:
>  Apparently it is starting to look like I've made a bad decision with wanting 
> to switch to S Scale.  The way I see it, right now this was a bad, bad 
> decision!  Bad attitudes from manufacturers and from others in the scale?  

  It still depends on what kind of modeling you want to do. If most of the 
stuff is available to create the railroad you want then S can be a great scale 
to work with. If you want everything that HO and N has then you will not be 
happy. Don't worry about the discussions, focus on the hardware. Draw up a plan 
of the layout you'd like to build and then check the supply of the things 
needed and see how it fits. If it don't work the first time tweak the design a 
bit to fit the supply and see if you still want to build it. Keep your design 
goals realistic from a size and complication standpoint remembering that in all 
scales you still gotta build all that scenery it don't build it's self, and 200 
or 300 freight cars in HO or N still need assembly, weathering and maintenance.
 If you already have an era and style of layout in mind the list members here 
probably already know the supply situation so run it by them. I'd say 1950-1970 
would be a piece of cake for almost any scenario and getting more difficult the 
more one moves forward or backward from there, I don't know if the others will 
agree with me though :>) ...DaveBranum  
  



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to