Scale my defy definition, but we know it when we see it.
Ben Trousdale
--- In [email protected], Bob Werre <bob@...> wrote:
>
> I think we have to leave an exact definition to the eyes and mind of the
> reader/modeler. It's the same with "beautiful"--we have beautiful
> models and we have beautiful models--meaning the MR calender and your
> typical swimsuit calender!
>
> Bob Werre
> PhotoTraxx
>
>
> On 4/22/13 10:08 PM, pickycat95 wrote:
> >
> > I have an idea. Let's all learn to distinguish between Ed's rhetorical
> > questions and those that are truly more tangible. I can imagine the
> > twinkle in Ed's eyes when he throws one of his classic 'r' bombs at
> > the list. This was quite blatant.
> > Ben Trousdale
> > >
> > > What I was looking for was an answer to the question of whether
> > Brooks layout is scale or not. In order to answer that question, I
> > need to know the precise definition of 'scale'. So far, I don't hear a
> > really good definition. To my way of thinking, a good definition would
> > clearly distinguish RTR tinplate from precision authenticity in order
> > to prevent confusion and misunderstanding when communicating.
> > >
> > > Maybe there is no way to define 'scale' the way we S guys commonly
> > use it?
> > >
> > > Thinking, always thinking.....Ed Loizeaux
> > >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
