Agree with all you say and they are to be approached but not till we hear from NMRA concerning their conversations on the same subject matter. Remember the NMRA standards are already there. The old NMRA RPs have been voided and the data included in the standards. So The appropriate people in the NMRA have hopefully already had these conversations.
My goal is not NEW stuff but rather to include the rest of the spectrum of S, not just "Scale", in the published standards. Talmadge C 'TC' Carr Sn42 and Hn42 somewhere in the wilds of the Pacific Northwest [email protected] On Jul 5, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Bill Nielsen wrote: > That being said, regarding the High-Rail/Deep-Flange figures, are any > manufacturers (Lionel, AM, and now MTH) currently abiding by any of those > numbers? I seem to recall that in the past, the makers of Hi-Rail products > pretty much used their own dimensions. If that's still the case, will > declaring the NMRA figures "standard" actually accomplish anything? That's > why I think they also should be involved in the process. ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
